<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Clusters a Dying Technology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electric-cloud.com/blog/2009/08/10/are-clusters-a-dying-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electric-cloud.com/blog/2009/08/10/are-clusters-a-dying-technology/</link>
	<description>This is your source for private development cloud best practices and technical tips and tricks for Electric Cloud solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 01:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Melski</title>
		<link>http://www.electric-cloud.com/blog/2009/08/10/are-clusters-a-dying-technology/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Melski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.electric-cloud.com/?p=495#comment-62</guid>
		<description>@RobH:  That&#039;s an excellent point, Rob.  Not only would users be able to continue to run builds, but that cluster node could even die in the middle of a build-in-progress and users would never even notice &#8212; the build would just carry on, assigning work to the remaining nodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RobH:  That&#8217;s an excellent point, Rob.  Not only would users be able to continue to run builds, but that cluster node could even die in the middle of a build-in-progress and users would never even notice &mdash; the build would just carry on, assigning work to the remaining nodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobH</title>
		<link>http://www.electric-cloud.com/blog/2009/08/10/are-clusters-a-dying-technology/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>RobH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.electric-cloud.com/?p=495#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Eric, I agree with your 3 reasons and would add a forth: Robustness. What happens when your 8-core desktop goes belly up and how long will it take IT to get it up and running again? Conversely, what happens when 1 of your 5 machines in the cluster goes off line? With a tool like Accelerator, you can still execute builds while IT fixes the offline server and your users may not even realize that a server was down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, I agree with your 3 reasons and would add a forth: Robustness. What happens when your 8-core desktop goes belly up and how long will it take IT to get it up and running again? Conversely, what happens when 1 of your 5 machines in the cluster goes off line? With a tool like Accelerator, you can still execute builds while IT fixes the offline server and your users may not even realize that a server was down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

